@BachelorsThesis{Kroschk:2014uv,
AUTHOR = {Kroschk, Axel},
TITLE = {{Infering New Knowlegde into Design Thinking Documentations}},
YEAR = {2014},
ADDRESS = {Potsdam},
ABSTRACT = {Design Thinking is a methodology that tackles complex and ambiguous problems. It requires both diverging and converging activities to ensure a solution that is desirable, feasible and viable at the same time. The reasoning as well as the justification behind the decisions that led to the final solution is called the design rationale. It has been shown that documentating the Design Thinking rationale improves the decision-making. At the HPI School of Design Thinking, where Design Thinking is taught to students, teams document their progress using online sharing plattforms that are hierarchically organized. However, in the process of documenting digitally, knowledge and most prominently the design rationale gets lost and needs to be recovered later on. Over the last two years, the software Project Zoom has been developed to visualize the docu- mentation and further integrate documentation into the Design Thinking process. In this bachelor thesis I propose a rule-based approach to recover the design thinking rationale, as well as to compute the relevance of Design Thinking artifacts documented in Project Zoom. The design of the ruleset is based on an analysis of the features of Project Zoom, interviews with coaches at the HPI School of Design Thinking and tests with Design Thinking Teams. A qualitative evaluation with a Design Thinking project shows the rulesets applicability.},
ANNOTE = {LANGUAGE : English}
}