Modular Generation and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems (bibtex)
Reference:
Oliver Oberschelp, Alfonso Gambuzza, Sven Burmester, Holger Giese, "Modular Generation and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems", in N. Callaos, W. Lesso, B. Sanchez, Eds., Proc. of the 8th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI), Orlando, USA, pp. 1-6, International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS), July 2004.
Abstract:
Simulation of complex mechatronic systems often requires decomposition of the model to be simulated. A decomposition aptly performed yields submodels that correspond to the technical structure of the modelled system. Thus a composition of models by means of existing components is made possible. Yet, coupling of the submodels affects the inner sequence of evaluation. This may result in deadlocks. We present an approach for the appropriate partitioning of the model code that allows keeping the inner evaluation flexible so that a deadlock-free coupling can be obtained. Submodels generated according to this approach have defined interfaces; therefore it is not necessary to consider the entire inner code for the sequence of evaluation to be known.
Links:
@InProceedings{OGBG03_ag,
AUTHOR = {Oberschelp, Oliver and Gambuzza, Alfonso and Burmester, Sven and Giese, Holger},
TITLE = {{Modular Generation and Simulation of Mechatronic Systems}},
YEAR = {2004},
MONTH = {July},
BOOKTITLE = {Proc. of the 8th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (SCI), Orlando, USA},
PAGES = {1-6},
EDITOR = {Callaos, N. and Lesso, W. and Sanchez, B.},
PUBLISHER = {International Institute of Informatics and Systemics (IIIS)},
URL = {http://www.upb.de/cs/ag-schaefer/Veroeffentlichungen/Quellen/Papers/2004/sci.pdf},
PDF = {sci.pdf},
ABSTRACT = {Simulation of complex mechatronic systems often requires decomposition of the model to be simulated. A decomposition aptly performed yields submodels that correspond to the technical structure of the modelled system. Thus a composition of models by means of existing components is made possible. Yet, coupling of the submodels affects the inner sequence of evaluation. This may result in deadlocks. We present an approach for the appropriate partitioning of the model code that allows keeping the inner evaluation flexible so that a deadlock-free coupling can be obtained. Submodels generated according to this approach have defined interfaces; therefore it is not necessary to consider the entire inner code for the sequence of evaluation to be known.}
}
Copyright notice: This material is presented to ensure timely dissemination of scholarly and technical work. Copyright and all rights therein are retained by authors or by other copyright holders. All persons copying this information are expected to adhere to the terms and constraints invoked by each author's copyright. In most cases, these works may not be reposted without the explicit permission of the copyright holder.
Powered by bibtexbrowser